Freddy ain't no satanist!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Critical Look at James Hind’s Dubious Claims of Child Protection.

Image
James Hind, a self-proclaimed child protection advocate, recently tweeted, "Project Night Watch vision is to create spaces online and in the real world called 'gardens' where children and young people can experience safety, courage and hope in the face of adversity. The symbol of these gardens is the 'three apple trees'." While on the surface this statement may appear well-intentioned, a deeper examination reveals troubling inconsistencies and raises significant concerns about Hind’s true motives and his understanding of child welfare. The Safe Spaces for Children: Homes, Not "Gardens". First and foremost, the notion that children need artificial "gardens" to feel safe and hopeful is perplexing. The true safe space for any child should be their home, where they are cared for by their family or guardians. Hind’s proposal to create these so-called "gardens" feels unnecessary at best, and manipulative at worst. Why does Hind feel t...
Read more

The Curious Case of James Hind: Satanist, Secret Identity, and the Quest for Truth.

Image
James Hind, a figure who associates himself with the Satanist label, operates in an unusual and often contradictory way. On the one hand, he actively cultivates an air of mystery around his identity, hiding behind a mask that ostensibly shields him from the prying eyes of the public. He admits that the stories he tells may be smokescreens or misdirections, meant to keep people from understanding his true self. Yet, paradoxically, he also expects his audience to believe the narratives he constructs about others—often people he disapproves of or considers his adversaries. It raises an essential question about credibility and accountability: how can someone who openly manipulates facts for the purpose of personal concealment demand trust from the very audience he’s keeping in the dark? Hind's narrative is emblematic of a larger issue—the challenge of distinguishing between the "truth" and a well-constructed fabrication. Here, we explore the unique ethical conundrum Hind pres...
Read more

The Prudish Critique of James Hind: A Misguided Attack on Matt Taylor’s Satirical Humour.

Image
In the ever-evolving landscape of online discourse, it seems that no joke is too obvious or too harmless to escape the ire of self-appointed moral crusaders. Case in point: James Hind's recent prudish outburst over Matt Taylor’s satirical jest about filming a pornographic movie titled "Taylor's Harem." Hind’s critique, dripping with righteous indignation, reads more like a puritanical sermon than a reasoned response to a piece of entertainment clearly labelled as satire. The Satire That Wasn’t Meant to Be Serious. Matt Taylor, never one to shy away from pushing the boundaries of humour, recently published a satirical piece where he jokingly invited public figures like Kim Sears and Meghan Markle to star in a fictional pornographic film. The story was clearly marked as a joke, intended for entertainment purposes only. To most, the absurdity of the scenario and the outlandishness of the concept were dead giveaways that Taylor’s intent was to amuse, not offend. Yet, Jame...
Read more