Ten Reasons Why James Hind is a Paedophile.

1. He wants to know everything about paedophilia.

2. He allowed a paedophile groomer from Kent to carry on grooming because he couldn’t live with the thought of ruining a paedophile’s life on his mind.

3. He supports alleged satanic paedophiles like the ex husband of Samatha Baldwin and the father in the Wilfred Wong case.

4. He shares disturbing imagery of child abuse, babies being eaten and children being kidnapped.

5. He pretends to be a 12 year old boy online.

6. He speaks to and shares very disturbing illegal content of the top level with children as young as 11 years old.

7. He’s obsessed and fixated with children and sees himself as their saviour and Black Knight hero.

8. He emotionally abused three teenage boys following the sudden and tragic death of their father.

9. He sexualised an innocent picture of a new born baby, seeing an erect penis, when everyone else sees an umbilical cord.

10. He doesn’t believe in Good or Evil, and views himself as his own God, with no higher authority above him.

Read more: Is James Hind a Paedophile? Too fucking right James Hind is a paedophile.

Make no mistake, James Hind (not his real name,) is a bona-afide satanic paedophile.

Plus he’s fucking loopy and deranged!

Satanism
Extremism
Child Protection

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Critical Look at James Hind’s Dubious Claims of Child Protection.

Image
James Hind, a self-proclaimed child protection advocate, recently tweeted, "Project Night Watch vision is to create spaces online and in the real world called 'gardens' where children and young people can experience safety, courage and hope in the face of adversity. The symbol of these gardens is the 'three apple trees'." While on the surface this statement may appear well-intentioned, a deeper examination reveals troubling inconsistencies and raises significant concerns about Hind’s true motives and his understanding of child welfare. The Safe Spaces for Children: Homes, Not "Gardens". First and foremost, the notion that children need artificial "gardens" to feel safe and hopeful is perplexing. The true safe space for any child should be their home, where they are cared for by their family or guardians. Hind’s proposal to create these so-called "gardens" feels unnecessary at best, and manipulative at worst. Why does Hind feel t...
Read more

The Prudish Critique of James Hind: A Misguided Attack on Matt Taylor’s Satirical Humour.

Image
In the ever-evolving landscape of online discourse, it seems that no joke is too obvious or too harmless to escape the ire of self-appointed moral crusaders. Case in point: James Hind's recent prudish outburst over Matt Taylor’s satirical jest about filming a pornographic movie titled "Taylor's Harem." Hind’s critique, dripping with righteous indignation, reads more like a puritanical sermon than a reasoned response to a piece of entertainment clearly labelled as satire. The Satire That Wasn’t Meant to Be Serious. Matt Taylor, never one to shy away from pushing the boundaries of humour, recently published a satirical piece where he jokingly invited public figures like Kim Sears and Meghan Markle to star in a fictional pornographic film. The story was clearly marked as a joke, intended for entertainment purposes only. To most, the absurdity of the scenario and the outlandishness of the concept were dead giveaways that Taylor’s intent was to amuse, not offend. Yet, Jame...
Read more

Speculation Grows Around Satanist James Hind: What Does His 4:15 AM Tweet Reveal?

Image
Recent activity on social media has once again brought James Hind, a self-proclaimed Satanist and controversial figure, under scrutiny. A tweet he posted at 4:15 AM has sparked widespread speculation, with some suggesting that this odd timing is not a coincidence, but rather a calculated move to avoid detection by those close to him—namely, his wife. A commentator noted, "It is likely to be 4:15 am because he doesn’t want his wife knowing he is back to his old tricks again. Remember he has been doorstepped. Remember he has been arrested three times before." This speculation, combined with Hind's past behaviour and legal issues, paints a picture of a man whose actions are increasingly viewed as obsessive and potentially dangerous. The early morning tweet adds another layer of intrigue to Hind's already controversial persona, raising questions about his true motivations and the lengths he will go to continue his activities. A Pattern of Secretive Behaviour? The timing o...
Read more