Analysing James Hind's Belief That He Is His Own God.
James Hind’s statement about his belief that he is his own God reveals a complex and deeply individualistic philosophy, rooted in a specific interpretation of Satanism. In his words: “When I live my life as a Satanist it is with the clear idea that I am God in my own life, and I bow to nothing or nobody when it comes to what happens in my life. I bow to no authority figure, no politician, no priest, no corporate, no group, no church, no guru, no family, no god, and no Satan. I am God in my life, nothing comes above me. I won’t grovel in the dirt, placing anything or anyone above me.”
 |
| Extract from James Hind's blog - Satanic Views |
This declaration encapsulates several key themes: extreme self-reliance, rejection of external authority, and the embrace of personal sovereignty. Let’s explore these themes further to understand the mindset and implications behind such a belief.
1. Extreme Self-Reliance and Personal Sovereignty.
Hind’s statement is a bold assertion of extreme self-reliance. By declaring himself as his own God, he is essentially stating that he is the ultimate authority in his life. This is not simply about being independent or making one’s own decisions; it is about rejecting any form of external guidance, influence, or control.
In many ways, this reflects the core principles of certain branches of Satanism, particularly those influenced by LaVeyan Satanism, which emphasises individualism, self-determination, and the rejection of conventional religious and moral norms. The idea of being one’s own God aligns with the Satanic principle of viewing the self as the centre of one’s own universe, where personal will and desire take precedence over any external dictates.
However, this extreme form of self-reliance can also lead to a form of isolation. By refusing to bow to any authority, Hind is effectively cutting himself off from the potential benefits of collective wisdom, societal norms, and even personal relationships. This self-imposed isolation might provide a sense of power and autonomy, but it can also lead to a lack of support systems and an increased burden of responsibility, as he alone is accountable for every aspect of his life.
2. Rejection of External Authority
Hind’s refusal to bow to any authority figure, politician, priest, or corporate entity is a clear rejection of external control. This can be seen as a rebellion against the structures that society imposes on individuals—structures that dictate behaviour, morality, and even thought. By placing himself above all these institutions, Hind is positioning himself as a radical individualist who answers to no one but himself.
This rejection of authority is a common theme in various countercultural movements and philosophies, where the individual seeks to break free from what is perceived as the oppressive or conformist nature of societal norms. In Hind’s case, his Satanist philosophy provides a framework for this rebellion, allowing him to reject not just religious or political authority, but any form of external influence that might limit his personal freedom.
However, this rejection of authority can also be seen as inherently contradictory. While it empowers the individual, it can also lead to a sense of alienation and disconnection from society. Authority figures and institutions, though often flawed, play a role in maintaining social order, providing guidance, and fostering community. By rejecting them outright, Hind risks isolating himself from these communal structures, potentially leading to conflict with others who do not share his views.
3. The Paradox of Self-Deification
The statement “I am God in my life, nothing comes above me” is a powerful assertion of self-deification. In declaring himself as his own God, Hind is essentially elevating his own will, desires, and values above everything else. This is a form of radical autonomy, where the self is the ultimate source of meaning and purpose.
However, there is a paradox in this self-deification. By becoming his own God, Hind is rejecting all other forms of divinity or higher power, including traditional conceptions of God, as well as Satan himself. This creates a tension between the desire for absolute autonomy and the potential for hubris. In many religious and philosophical traditions, the idea of self-deification is seen as dangerous, as it can lead to an inflated sense of self-importance and a disconnect from the humility that often accompanies the acknowledgment of something greater than oneself.
Moreover, the idea of being one’s own God can lead to moral relativism, where the individual sets their own standards of right and wrong without any external reference points. This can be both liberating and dangerous, as it allows for complete freedom in decision-making but also removes the checks and balances that come from external moral or ethical systems.
4. The Psychological Implications
Hind’s statement also raises questions about the psychological underpinnings of such a belief system. The assertion that “nothing comes above me” could be indicative of a deep-seated need for control and autonomy, possibly rooted in past experiences where Hind felt powerless or subjugated by external forces. By adopting a belief system where he is the ultimate authority, Hind may be compensating for these past experiences, asserting his dominance in a way that protects his sense of self.
Additionally, the mention of refusing to “grovel in the dirt” suggests a rejection of vulnerability and a need to maintain a position of power at all times. This could indicate a fear of being seen as weak or subordinate, driving Hind to adopt a stance of perpetual self-elevation.
If Hind indeed suffers from Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), as suggested in previous discussions, this belief in self-deification could be a coping mechanism to manage the internal fragmentation characteristic of the disorder. By asserting that he is the ultimate authority in his life, Hind may be attempting to reconcile conflicting identities or protect his core self from perceived threats.
5. Conclusion: The Delusion of Absolute Authority
James Hind’s belief that he is his own God is a striking example of extreme individualism and self-reliance, taken to its logical extreme. While it offers a sense of empowerment and autonomy, it also carries significant risks, including isolation, moral relativism, and potential psychological harm.
In the end, the notion of being one’s own God reflects a complex interplay between the desire for freedom and the rejection of external control. It challenges traditional notions of authority, morality, and community, while also revealing the potential dangers of self-deification. Whether this belief system can truly sustain Hind in the long term remains to be seen, but it is clear that it comes with both profound empowerment and significant challenges.
James Hind: The Dangerous Delusion of Being Above the Law.
https://guerrillademocracy.blogspot.com/2024/08/james-hind-dangerous-delusion-of-being.html
The Disturbing Behaviour of James Hind: Slander, Libel, and Harassment in the Name of “Child Protection”.
James Hind Returns to Twitter: Obsession with Matt Taylor Continues.
https://laughingatsatanists.blogspot.com/2024/08/james-hind-returns-to-twitter-obsession.html
The Hypocrisy of James Hind: A Fake Child Advocate with an Unhealthy Obsession in Children.
https://laughingatsatanists.blogspot.com/2024/08/the-hypocrisy-of-james-hind-fake-child.html
Satanic Stalker James Hind Breaks Silence with False Claims About Matt Taylor.
https://laughingatsatanists.blogspot.com/2024/08/satanic-stalker-james-hind-breaks.html
Comments
Post a Comment